![]() BTW, a lot of site do this - just list the specs of some new equipment. I would not call this an equipment review. So it isn't so much of a review, as a listing of the specs and maybe he will give his opinion of the where the product fits into the current products available. How can you be sure of this? I have seen the "reviews" he does of extremely new equipment that he probably did not touch - but he says in the "review" that he has not actually touched the equipment (when he actually has not). He reads the manufacturers specs and "reviews" the equipment based on that, without using it, and sucks people into thinking he knows what he is talking about. I have looked through some of his photography - and frankly I don't think his style appeals too much to me, and probably not to a lot of you either.īut - this guy has a massive database of equipment that he has reviewed -Ī lot of (almost all of) his reviews are done without ever touching the equipment. ![]() Why do so many pe-s leople hate this guy. I see so many people talk badly about Ken Rockwell. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |